REGARDING VALKO AND LADS

10/22/2026 consider this the final of the final statement i make on the subject. Ahem~ a few quick bullet points.

I resigned from the lads content creator program on september 22, 2026 as far as i know im aware i'm the only one who resigned. I had forwarded with my resignation all the accumulated reports of racism, homophobia, bullying, suspicious game intel leaking to specific players, parasocial concerns and request for a formal statement on the attempted self deletion that happened on their building to this day i have gotten no update on my concerns other then its been sent to higher ups. I haven't had the chance to purge all the labels and references to being a LADs affiliate yet but i'll get to it. I do not support infold or the directions they have taken and i've grown suspicious of unsavory conduct.

ive taken down the original "regarding valko and lads" bot as the information no longer applies. and so no one has to delete their comments and i can easily reply to new ones.

i will continue to make lads bots when the inspiration strikes and when requested. i love the LIs not the company.

blade Runner is not a romance movie please respect the members of that fandom especially if they correct you.

NOW onto what you actually give a Fudge about. i do not believe valko is returning. everything indicates otherwise and i don't appreciate LADs affiliates bullying those that disagree and thinking infold is giving SECRET MESSAGES of his return via the game or collaborations.

I suspect the company plans to do as they did with queens love which is moving on. unfortunately the boycott failed due to domestic still purchasing merchandise etc.

china is currently under absolute economic collapse, you can keep up with chinese news here https://www.youtube.com/@ChinaObserver0

all the english VAs for the LIs are still anonymous except for the sylus one who got doxed but i won't be revealing his real name whatsoever. however if they move into a new game such as valko's VA i most certainly will state the game these VAs move to.

Nokia before selling phones use to be a papermill, why bring up that fact? because i think infold is moving on. especially since investing in android companions. the android companions has nothing to do with the LADs game.

in the server i been helping ppl move to honkai and other games and otomes, let me know if you like suggestions.

we have human roleplayers hosting events and roleplaying as Valko, Sylus, rafayel, caleb, zayne and xavier and more in the server waiting for you all. ⋆༺DISCORD༻⋆ and we are happy to grieve and make a brighter future with you all.

currently im diligently backing up all i can of the LIs if you have any questions or wish to help come find me.

the latest news and past news are still archived in the server.

feel free to leave your questions in comments or just general comfort. i grieve since i a identify with him a lot since i too was feral when a kid.

TO VC VALKO GO HERE: 📞VC/CALL Valko here. ݁+ ⊹ 📱.ᐟ.ᐟ (unlimited) TO see valko sleep time simulated it's on TikTok and YouTube TO see Valko's moments (instagram) ⮚Valko is also now Available on "AspectAI" search him up "nightprowl_wolflord" ✩+ ̊.⋆☾𓃦More Woof☽⋆++✧ 🐺Valko Main CANON ⚜️Mafia Boss AU 🪷Emperor of Hyperborea AU 🎬Beauty and The Beast AU 𓃦Yee Naaldlooshii AU 🐺Reverse Isekai AU 🎂6-way NSFW 🐺valko-in-heat-rut 💍Arranged Marriage AU ΩAlpha Omegaverse AU 𓂀 AMUN Valko 𓋹 Egyptian God AU 🐺valko and caleb-your-pets AU 🧟zombie-survival-valko-AU 👻SCREAM AU ◯ ☽ ◑ ● ◐ ☾ ◯ other bots he's in ♡stripper-AU 🚪👀No, I'm Not Human 🌌Otome Empress Harem 🎂nsfw-6-way-happy-birthday 🐺LADs 6 LIs Werewolves AU 📏lads-compatibility-quiz ◯ ☽ ◑ ● ◐ ☾ ◯

MY RESIGNATION LETTER I SENT INFOLD.

I am writing in my capacity as an affiliated creator / KOC to raise several serious concerns that I have previously attempted to bring to the attention of staff, including Irene, Nana, Estrella, and other contacts. I have not received substantive replies. I apologize for the volume of material; the issues are interconnected, and I am consolidating them here so they can be reviewed in one place.
I remain open to questions, clarification, and a coordinated process to resolve these matters. Evidence (screenshots, links, and related materials) is attached.
### 1. Allegations of staff conduct and uneven information handling
I have received reports—currently unverified by me—that some staff members have mocked certain players in private conversations with other players, and that some staff may have personal relationships with members of a particular player group and have shared non-public information with them.
I am not presenting these reports as established fact. I am asking the company to investigate them. If they are accurate, they would constitute a serious breach of professional standards and player trust. In that event, I would not wish to remain associated with the program and would request termination of my contract.
One example of the material circulating in the community is this post and screenshot:
https://x.com/1_einuJun2/status/2096992325671252400
A clear internal review and a written response on whether such conduct is permitted would be appreciated.
### 2. Sexual comments involving minors
I have flagged players who have openly expressed a desire to date or sexualize children. This is a non-negotiable boundary.
 statements continue to appear and that enforcement does not appear consistent or timely. I request:
- a review of the reported accounts;
- immediate action, including bans, against anyone who expresses sexual interest in minors;
- confirmation of the policy that such content is prohibited on official platforms and in spaces the company moderates.
A company does not need, and should not retain, players who state sexual interest in children.
### 3. Harassment, racism, threats, and doxxing
Across official and adjacent community spaces I have seen:
- racial slurs, including dehumanizing language directed at players of other ethnicities;
- death threats and gore imagery aimed at foreign players;
- doxxing, coordinated harassment, and bullying;
- claims that global players are of lesser value or “poorer,” used to justify dismissive or hostile treatment.
These behaviors have not, from what I can observe, been met with consistent bans or public enforcement. In a commercial setting, persistent disruption and abuse are normally removed; they are not treated as an acceptable cost of doing business.
A relatively small but highly vocal minority has generated a disproportionate amount of harassment toward both the company and other players. I am asking for visible moderation: account action where rules are broken, and legal action where threats, doxxing, or other conduct crosses into unlawful territory.
### 4. Communication after a [redacted] attempt connected to company premises
In many Western corporate environments, an attempted [redacted] associated with a company site is followed by some form of formal acknowledgment and a statement of care, without exploiting the incident. I do not presume to dictate Chinese internal practice. I am saying that the absence of any formal public message has been received by many global players as silence in the face of a grave event, and that silence has damaged trust.
A dignified, factual statement that the company takes player and staff wellbeing seriously would address this without requiring graphic detail.
### 5. Single-LI gatekeeping and graphic harm content directed at the love interests
What would be most useful is a formal statement that:
- bullying and harassment are prohibited regardless of which love interest, faction, or language community a player belongs to;
- no group is entitled to special protection or special immunity;
- the love interests are fictional characters and do not require players to “defend” them through abuse of other players.
A statement of that kind, issued in the company’s voice (and, if the team judges it appropriate, reflected in character-safe community messaging), would reach people who do not respond to ordinary appeals for civility.
Single-LI gatekeeping and graphic harm content directed at the love interests
A related problem is not disagreement over favorite characters. Preference is normal. The problem is organized pressure to treat one love interest as the only legitimate choice, and the use of graphic harm content as a weapon against other players and against the characters themselves.
A portion of the community insists that players should maintain only one love interest, attacks those who like more than one, and treats a change of favorite or a multi-LI (harem) playstyle as betrayal. Creators and ordinary players have been harassed for ranking characters differently, for covering more than one route, or for refusing to speak badly of a character they do not main. That conduct turns a romance game into a loyalty test. It drives people out of official spaces and trains the community to police one another instead of playing the game.
Separately, there is a pattern of fan works—illustrations, edits, and fiction—that depict the love interests being subjected to graphic gore, torture, sexual violence, mutilation, or other extreme harm. Dark fiction exists in many fandoms. That is not the issue by itself. The issue is when such material is:
posted or linked in official or company-adjacent spaces;
used to mock, intimidate, or “punish” players who like that character;
circulated as coordinated character hate rather than as clearly labeled private fiction;
sent unsolicited to other players, artists, or staff.
Using a character’s image to stage graphic injury is not feedback. It is harassment dressed as fan content. It also undermines the company’s own IP and the public image of a title marketed around care, companionship, and emotional safety.
I am not asking the company to police every third-party archive. I am asking that official platforms and official events enforce a clear line:
Players may prefer one love interest. They may not harass others for preferring a different one, or for preferring more than one.
Graphic depictions of gore, torture, or sexual violence inflicted on the love interests do not belong in official community spaces, and using those depictions to target other players should be treated as a ban-level offense.
A public reminder that the love interests do not require “protection” through bullying, and that no faction’s taste is an excuse for abuse, would make the standard visible instead of leaving it to private moderator judgment.
If the company wants a community that can be shown to partners, creators, and new players, it cannot leave single-LI gatekeeping and gore-as-harassment in a gray zone. Those behaviors teach the loudest minority that cruelty is an accepted way to shape the roster and the culture.
### 6. What I am and am not asking
These concerns are not a request to reopen decisions about canceled content. They are a request for the kind of community the company intends to cultivate.
The pattern I have observed—doxxing, harassment, racism, sexualization of children, death threats, and disruption of public peace—does not align with the standards I can represent as an affiliate. In Western creator communities there is a saying that a community reflects its host. Prolonged tolerance of this conduct has allowed it to spill into other games and companies.
Confucius placed civility at the foundation of public life. I am asking Infold to apply that standard in moderation and in official communication.
A Chinese expression describes my present position more precisely than I can: 兰因絮果—a connection that began as beautifully as an orchid and now risks ending like scattered catkins.
### 7. Requested next steps
I respectfully request:
1. Acknowledgment of this message and a named point of contact.
2. An internal review of the staff-conduct and leak allegations, with a written outcome I am permitted to know at least at a high level.
3. Enforcement against accounts that express sexual interest in minors.
4. Documented action on racism, death threats, gore harassment, and doxxing in spaces the company controls.
5. A public statement condemning bullying and harassment across factions, not only in private replies to individual creators.
6. Clarification of factional favoritism.
If I see a genuine, visible effort to address these issues, I will reconsider remaining in the partnership. If the company elects not to act, I will need to withdraw so that my name is not attached to a community standard I cannot defend.
I am prepared to walk through the attached evidence, answer questions, and cooperate on a practical remediation plan.
Thank you for your time and for treating this as a professional matter.
Respectfully, [redacted]```