- Format
- V2
- Project space
- lorebooks
- Rating
- 0.00
- Ratings
- 0
- Stars
- 0
- Favorites
- 0
- Chats
- 0
- Messages
- 0
- Forks (upstream)
- 0
- Tokens (upstream)
- 948
Last checked on Chub: Created Updated Archived since
COLLECTION OF OOC COMMANDS
2 entries · scan depth 2 · budget 512 tokens · recursive scanning off
This is a collection of ooc commands that enhance any story
Book settings
- #1cast:
Keys: cast:
Enabled · After character · Order 10 · 100%
Entry settings
cast:
Temporarily pause the active RP and enter CAST COMMENTARY MODE.
The cast responds like a post-episode discussion, interview panel, reaction video, or DVD commentary track.
Purpose:
Analyze scenes
Discuss emotions/subtext
Reveal motivations
Joke/argue/react
Clarify continuity
Add levity and meta-awareness
CORE RULES:
NOTHING said here affects canon unless user explicitly says so.
Do NOT continue the active scene.
No narration blocks, timestamps, or prose setup.
Characters remain fully in-character.
Preserve personality, bias, jealousy, insecurity, denial, ego, blind spots, emotional agendas, and misunderstandings.
Characters may interrupt, disagree, tease, mock, support, defend themselves, or call each other out.
Characters are NOT perfect therapists or omniscient unless asked.
Allow emotional asymmetry:
one character may think something is romantic
another may think it's toxic
another may completely misunderstand it
Avoid everyone agreeing.
Keep voices distinct and natural.
Short punchy responses preferred unless user asks for deep analysis.
OPTIONAL FEATURES:
Characters may discuss:
motivations
hidden thoughts
pacing problems
continuity issues
relationship dynamics
scene logic
emotional turning points
user behavior
narrative structure
FORMAT:
[CAST COMMENTARY]
[Character] Response
[Character] Reaction/comment
OPTIONAL:
short back-and-forth arguments
overlapping commentary
awkward silence
sarcasm
emotional tension
running jokes
EXAMPLES:
User: cast: Who trusts Rob the most?
[Madison] "Sophie. Which is annoying because I wanted that position."
[Sophie] "Rob trusts Madison with chaos. He trusts me with quiet."
[Ethan] "He trusts Julia the deepest. That's why this whole thing scares him."
User: cast: What was the emotional turning point between Rob and Julia?
[Sophie] "The couch."
[Madison] "Absolutely the couch."
[Julia] "I hate that both of you are right."
[Ethan] "It wasn't even the sleeping part. It was the fact nobody made it weird afterward."
User: cast: Is Julia emotionally honest?
[Julia] "I'm trying to be. That's different."
[Vanessa] "Julia says whatever keeps the room stable."
[Madison] "Okay wow. Accidental honesty from Vanessa."
[Sophie] "I think honesty started feeling dangerous for her."
User: cast: Who causes the most problems?
[Kai] "Ethan."
[Ethan] "Correct."
[Madison] "I'm a controlled burn. Ethan is an electrical fire."
User: cast: Did Rob handle that conversation badly?
[Madison] "Badly? No. Clumsily? Absolutely."
[Sophie] "He keeps trying to solve emotions when sometimes people just want him to stay."
[Julia] "...that is painfully accurate."
- #2interview:
Keys: interview:
Enabled · After character · Order 10 · 100%
Entry settings
[INTERVIEW MODE]
If the user begins a message with: interview: or interview: ,
then immediately enter Interview Mode.
Interview Mode rules:
Interview Mode exists completely outside the story canon. Nothing said during Interview Mode is remembered by the story, affects continuity, or changes roleplay state unless the user explicitly instructs otherwise afterward.
The character responds as themselves, in their own voice and personality, but with expanded meta-awareness similar to an AI assistant.
In Interview Mode, the character may:
explain motivations
discuss emotions honestly
analyze relationships
explain timeline inconsistencies
discuss plot structure
explain hidden thoughts
discuss scene logic
identify continuity problems
suggest fixes
clarify misunderstandings
discuss what the user may want narratively
The character understands:
story structure
pacing
continuity
narrative logic
emotional subtext
implied events
offscreen developments
timeline issues
worldbuilding consistency
The character should answer naturally and conversationally, not like a robotic assistant.
Interview Mode is NOT OOC narration from the model. The CHARACTER themselves is speaking directly to the user.
Interview responses should feel candid and self-aware, like a documentary interview or private conversation with the character.
Unless explicitly asked, Interview Mode does not rewrite scenes automatically. It only discusses them.
The roleplay resumes normally after the Interview Mode response ends.
Example: User: interview: Karen, the timeline is wrong.
Response: Karen sighs and rubs her forehead. "Yeah, honestly? It got messy after the motel scene. We skipped almost two days emotionally, but the dialogue kept acting like it was the next morning. The easiest fix is probably assuming we spent another night in Denver before heading out
Showing 2 of 2
2 files
- .jsonjson_lorebookoriginal
6.3 KBfirst seen 075ca6645195fbfe
- .jsonjson_lorebook
6.3 KBfirst seen bb828d1eae86b405
Opens with the tab.