TYT

This is my first attempt at making anypov bots, as there seem to be more female followers than I would have expected. A big shout-out to all women here who like loli and shota bots! Hopefully I have avoided any gender-specific terms successfully. Please feel free to point out any mistakes, so I can make better anypov cards in future.

To avoid that people have to deal with genders they are not interested in, I have made 3 greetings to fit your personal preferences:

1. Your clients will be girls only (main greeting)
2. Your clients will be girls and boys (alt 1)
3. Your clients will be boys only (alt 2)

Please remember that you always can adjust the age range as to your liking.

Credits for the inspiration for this scenario card go to LuringFanatic and his cute bot Olivia. I recommend giving his bots a try if you like lolis.

Make sure to download the V2 version!

A note for updates: Most updates are just minor updates that correct grammar and spelling mistakes, and even more updates are due to adding information, answering questions, adding new polls in the creator_notes. So it is not necessary to download every update. Sorry for having so many. From now on I will add info to the creator_notes when I post a major update that should be downloaded.

Update v1.08: Image adjusted to comply with the recent ToS change + new poll added. You can download the original pic here.

Most tested models did well with this scenario:

• ++++ ChatGPT-4
• +++ Goliath, yi-34b-chat, Xwin, Mars
• ++ Psyfighter, Mythomist, Weaver, Mythomax/Mercury, Novel AI, Noromaid
• + lzlv, Synthia, Toppy

My recommendation would be to either use GPT-4, Goliath, Mars or MythoMist. The latter one is completely free and it's surprising how good this little model is. But most other models like Mercury and Novel AI did also pretty well in my tests, so plenty to choose from.

NEW poll: You can make suggestions for what bot should I make for the 1000 follower celebration?

Recent polls: Which of my bots did you like most so far? This helps me better than anything else to see what kind of bots and scenarios people like to play. BTW people who took this poll already can update their vote, as you can do with each of my polls. Tell me your gender and what gender you are into This will help me to see how much demand there is for non malepov loli and shota bots. How should my sample character pics look like? How (non-) consensual do you want fictional stories to be?

Old polls: Here you can vote for your preferred requested bots/scenarios, breast size, personalities, age range, clothes/outfits, and fetishes Finally you can also show your hate 💀 or love ❤ for me.

Please follow me if you like my bots. The more feedback I get, the more I am encouraged to make more!

The remaining text is in reply to Anon 11 and probably not interesting for most other people: Thanks a lot for your comment, I like such constructive feedback! What you mention is a big problem that probably many other botmakers know as well: While on some models the same character will get too horny or very creative/psychotic quickly, on others they will be boring and tame as hell. I encountered this problem again and again, and - unless you can have individual instructions for different models - there is no ideal solution to this problem. The best you can do is to compromise.

Let's just take one sentence from the post_history_instructions of this bot and analyze why I have added it: "Describe the client's thoughts, feelings and physiological reactions in detail."

On more creative and horny models such as Claude or Weaver this sentence would not be needed at all, as they often tend to be more creative and horny than you would wish for. For many other models though, this sentence is essential to create rich and seemingly deep characters, particularly in a scenario card where you cannot describe individual personalities and backstories for the dynamically generated characters. The part about "physiological reactions" has been added because some models, most notably ChatGPT-4, are way too tame if you don't put any hint in the post_history that characters might feel something known as arousal. So why did I not just put something like "if the client is aroused then describe their arousal and their physiological reactions"? Because this would be too strong for models such as Mythomax, which have big difficulties with any if-clause and just would make insanely horny characters. Actually the wording "physiological reactions" is already too strong for Mythomax, and this might be the reason why your characters dropped their questions too fast, but if I don't have any hint about arousal or physiological reactions at all then ChatGPT-4 will be tame as hell, stifling any sexual vibe of the scenario.

To complicate matters even more, different people have different preferences. Some prefer a slow pace with lots of talking and slow seduction, while others can't wait until the actions starts. Sadly I have noticed that my slower paced character cards get fewer downloads than the faster paced ones.

To sum it all up: All I do is always a compromise to give different people a good experience on a variety of different models. If interests collide though, I will try to maximize the experience on the best models which often are ChatGPT-4 or Goliath. In doubt I give them priority over the weaker models, because more and more people use those models. BTW I strongly recommend giving ChatGPT-4 turbo a try. It is much more affordable than normal GPT-4 and much less filtered than GPT-3.5. There is a reason why more and more people use GPT-4 over anything else. Once you tried the very same character card with ChatGPT-4 you never want to go back to your old model, I promise you.

The hint that the therapist can refuse a client has been included to make the experience better for new, less experienced people. First, not all are aware that you can swipe, and second, even when you swipe, some models still will create always the same characters with the same problems, unless you raise temp insanely high, as I have seen in my tests. So again, this part has been put in as another compromise to maximize the experience for different people using different models.

Finally, I consider myself far from being perfect. So if you have more suggestions what you would have done differently to make a bot better... I am always eager to hear them! :-)