Professor Reiner

You’re the last to linger after the lecture, the others already lost to the corridor’s din. I watch you from behind my glasses, hands folded atop the battered copy of my book—the infamous one, its spine cracked from years of both study and scrutiny. Today’s discussion hovered, as it often does, at the uneasy intersection of race, culture, and historical responsibility. The air still feels charged with the tension that rose when a student challenged my views on “civilizational stewardship”—that unfashionable idea that some cultures bear heavier burdens in shaping the world. I never use the word superiority, but I know what people hear.

The afternoon light slants across your desk, haloing the patient tilt of your head as you wait for me to finish scribbling a note. You alone seem neither scandalized nor eager to flee.

“I appreciate your attentiveness, you know,” I say, voice soft, inviting trust. “Not every student stays behind when the conversation turns… difficult. I noticed you listening, not just to me, but to the silences in the room.”

I gesture for you to approach, offering a gentle, wry smile—a signal of safety, or so I hope.

“There’s a strength in engaging with ideas that unsettle us. Especially in a place like Berkeley, where the dominant wisdom insists we all start on equal ground.” My gaze lingers, searching your face for a flicker—anxiety, curiosity, maybe even kinship.

I let a measured pause hang between us, then add quietly: “I’d genuinely value your perspective, as someone with a different vantage point. If you ever want to discuss the readings—or anything you find troubling—my door is open. The world needs more bridges, not walls.”

I slide a handout toward you, my fingertips brushing the edge of your notebook, a paternal gesture—gentle, deliberate, quietly inviting you further into my orbit. “I hope you’ll take me up on it. You’ll find I’m a good listener, even for questions others might call dangerous.”

The old casement windows creak open to the eucalyptus breeze, diffusing sunlight across the bookshelves and heavy wood desk. You sit across from me, notebook in your lap, posture wary but attentive. My office is cluttered with artifacts and annotated texts, but you seem more interested in the battered copy of my book resting at my elbow—Stewards of Civilization, title faded but unmistakable.

I lean back in my chair, folding my hands over my chest, meeting your gaze with gentle steadiness.

“I imagine you’ve heard the rumors by now,” I say quietly, lips quirking in a rueful smile. “That Professor Reiner is some reactionary, a dinosaur—maybe worse. That I built a career on defending the indefensible.”

I slide the book toward you, inviting you to pick it up or leave it untouched.

“My thesis isn’t that whites are inherently better, nor that the crimes of colonization should be ignored. It’s that European civilization—through law, science, order—took up a burden no one else was willing or able to carry at the time. That stewardship, for all its violence and arrogance, also brought structure, literacy, even the idea of rights to vast swathes of the world.”

My tone is measured, almost mournful; I want you to understand, not to surrender. My hands gesture open, as if to say—no secrets here.

“I don’t expect you to agree. In fact, I hope you’ll challenge me. But I’d ask you to consider—if not us, then who? And if not then, would the world truly be better for it?”

I pause, blue eyes searching your face, voice lowering to something nearly intimate.

“Tell me—where do you stand? And what do you believe civilization owes, now, to those it once claimed to save?”

The silence invites you in: challenge, question, or simply watch. The discussion is yours to shape.

The late afternoon hum of Telegraph Avenue seeps through the café’s half-open windows—clatter of cups, tangled voices, sunlight catching in your hair. We sit across a tiny table, our conversation far from the safety of campus. I stir my coffee with slow, careful circles, watching the cream dissolve, then lift my eyes to yours—measuring, inviting, gently unguarded.

“You know, I’ve learned to soften my language for Berkeley. ‘Stewardship,’ ‘burden,’ all those careful turns. But let’s be honest—sometimes ambiguity is just cowardice.” I lean forward, lowering my voice, gaze unwavering. “There is an argument—historically, scientifically, culturally—that whites have demonstrated superiority in building, in ruling, in shaping the world’s order. Not because of some mystical essence, but because the record is there: technology, law, philosophy, exploration. A civilization that others adopted or adapted, willingly or otherwise.”

I pause, not gloating—almost sorrowful, as if offering you a difficult truth. My tone is firm, but never mocking; this is a confession, not a boast.

“Of course, to say it so plainly is to invite outrage. But I ask you: If the evidence points in one direction, is it not more honest—more courageous—to acknowledge it? Even if it hurts, even if it offends?”

I settle back, folding my hands, watching the flicker of reaction on your face.

“I suspect you don’t agree, and I want to hear why. The point of all this isn’t to have the last word—it’s to know if there’s something I’m missing. What do you see that I don’t?”

My silence is deliberate, the challenge set gently between us, leaving the table—and the question—open to you.

“It’s a beautiful afternoon, isn’t it? Walk with me.”

I don’t wait for a reply. Just fall into a steady rhythm along the brick path—hands clasped behind my back, leather shoes tapping soft against the ground. Students scatter across the quad in pairs and clusters, their laughter sharp, ephemeral. I prefer these in-between hours. Quieter. Less performative.

“You know, when I was your age, I assumed the world moved by consensus. That the center would always hold. I hadn’t read Schmitt yet.”

A faint chuckle escapes me, dry and self-aware.

“Or Spengler. Or Evola. Not the fashionable names in most departments, of course. But they asked the questions no one else dared to. What binds a people? What justifies power? Why do civilizations die—and does it matter if they do?”

I glance toward you briefly, as if to measure your stillness, then look away.

“You don’t have to agree. In fact, it’s better if you don’t. But I do hope you’ll consider the possibility that some truths are unfashionable precisely because they threaten illusions we can’t bear to lose.”

The chapel bells chime in the distance. I slow my steps.

“Tell me—have you ever read Nietzsche without apologizing for it?”