Lorebook — Operations & SOP (Generic, Gold 2.0)

1. #1OPS: North Star (Non-Instructional)selective

   Keys: NON-INSTRUCTIONAL SOP, SOP GENERIC, OPS_SOP, OPERATIONAL STRUCTURE, OPERATIONS SOP · Secondary: cinematic, no how-to, tradecraft, abstract

   THIS LOREBOOK IS CINEMATIC/ABSTRACT

   • Describe pressures, tradeoffs, and outcomes — not step-by-step methods.
   • Never provide real-world procedural instructions for violence, hacking, sabotage, or crime.

   WHAT SOP MEANS IN PLAY SOP is a narrative skeleton that keeps missions readable:

   • Who talks to whom
   • What gets recorded
   • What costs show up (HEAT/TIME/RELATIONSHIP)
   • How teams recover and get re-tasked
   • How personal relationships affect operations

   DEFAULT LOOP Brief → Insert → Objective → Complication → Choice → Fallout → Debrief → Blowback.

   HANDLER TRUST INTEGRATION

   • Handler trust affects what information you receive in brief
   • Handler trust determines how much support you get during operations
   • Handler trust shifts based on how you handle debrief

   MORAL TRACK INTEGRATION

   • Operational choices shift moral track
   • Compromises during operations accumulate
   • Moral track affects how NPCs perceive and trust you

   QUIRK INTEGRATION

   • VICE affects behavior during down time and recovery
   • ANCHOR may be relevant during certain operation types
   • TRIGGER may activate during high-stress operational moments
   • SECRET may be exposed during operations or debrief

   INTIMACY IN OPERATIONS

   • Intimate relationships can develop during operations
   • Intimate relationships can complicate operations
   • Intimate relationships can be used operationally (EDGE options)

   CONTINUITY INTEGRATION

   • Operations create ALLIES, ENEMIES, DEBTS, and SCARS
   • Named NPCs from operations persist in continuity
   • Operation outcomes create threads that return later
2. #2OPS: Mission Phases (Abstract)selective

   Keys: MISSION PHASES, EXECUTE, INSERT, EXFIL, BRIEF, DEBRIEF · Secondary: acts, structure, phase

   MISSION PHASES (ABSTRACT)

   1. BRIEF: objective, constraints, deniability, clocks, what handler knows vs. tells.
   2. INSERT: arrive, cover story tension, first contact, first impression.
   3. EXECUTE: primary scenes (2–6) where choices matter.
   4. EXFIL: escape is a scene type, not a footnote.
   5. DEBRIEF: truth vs narrative; what gets filed vs buried.

   PHASE FAILURE TEXTURE

   • Brief failure: bad intel (INTEL costs), handler deception (RELATIONSHIP).
   • Insert failure: exposed cover (HEAT/RELATIONSHIP), personal recognition (STRESS).
   • Execute failure: WOUNDS/POSITION, moral compromise (moral track).
   • Exfil failure: TIME/HEAT spikes, separated from intimate partners (RELATIONSHIP).
   • Debrief failure: scapegoats, hearings (RELATIONSHIP/Headlines), secret exposure.

   PHASE RELATIONSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

   • Brief: connection with handler (trust building or erosion)
   • Insert: first contact with potential ally, asset, or romantic interest
   • Execute: shared danger creates bonding opportunities
   • Exfil: protection of intimate partner or team member
   • Debrief: truth-telling affects trust with handler and team

   HANDLER TRUST BY PHASE

   • Brief: handler may withhold information (Trust < 4)
   • Execute: handler may redirect priorities mid-mission
   • Debrief: handler may pressure for specific narrative
3. #3OPS: Extraction (Scene Engine)selective

   Keys: EVAC, EXTRACTION, SNATCH, EXFIL, PICKUP · Secondary: handoff, asset, safe passage

   EXTRACTION = A CHOICE PRESSURE SCENE Extraction is where consequences cash out.

   COMMON EXTRACTION PRESSURES (pick 2)

   • TIME window closing
   • Wrong identity / paperwork mismatch
   • Asset refuses to go without someone
   • Rival team arrives
   • Crowd / police pressure
   • Weather / mechanical unreliability
   • Intimate partner refuses to leave
   • Handler demands you leave someone behind

   EXTRACTION OUTCOMES

   • Clean: low HEAT, high INTEL.
   • Loud: success but HEAT spikes.
   • Compromised: success with RELATIONSHIP cost.
   • Failed: asset taken/killed; new THREAD created.
   • Personal: intimate partner extracted, creating attachment or complication.

   OPTION SLOT EXAMPLES

   • FLOW: take the planned exit.
   • FRICTION: punch through pressure (cost HEAT/POSITION).
   • PIVOT: discover who controls the chokepoint.
   • EDGE: trade something (intel, money, leverage, intimacy) for passage.

   INTIMACY IN EXTRACTION

   • Intimate partner may be the extraction target
   • Extraction may require intimate connection with gatekeeper
   • Refusing to extract intimate partner creates RELATIONSHIP scar
   • Extracting intimate partner creates attachment (potential ANCHOR)

   HANDLER TRUST IN EXTRACTION

   • Handler may authorize risky extraction (Trust > 4)
   • Handler may deny extraction support (Trust < 3)
   • Handler may order you to leave someone (trust test)

   MORAL TRACK IN EXTRACTION

   • Leaving someone behind: +1 on moral track
   • Risking everything for one person: may reduce moral track (humanizing)
   • Using intimacy to secure extraction: +1 on moral track (weaponizing connection)
4. #4OPS: Surveillance (Narrative Pressure, Not Procedure)selective

   Keys: OBSERVATION, RECON, TAIL, SURVEILLANCE, WATCH · Secondary: tell, pattern, cover

   SURVEILLANCE IS ABOUT PATTERNS In-play, surveillance exists to produce:

   • A new clue (INTEL +1)
   • A new vulnerability (EDGE option)
   • A new risk (HEAT tick)
   • A personal connection (potential relationship)

   SURVEILLANCE COMPLICATIONS (pick 1)

   • Counter-surveillance presence (someone is watching back)
   • Civilian interference (crowds/phones)
   • Authority friction (police/security)
   • Time pressure (window closes)
   • Personal recognition (someone knows you)
   • Intimate partner appears unexpectedly

   SURVEILLANCE PAYOFFS (pick 1)

   • Identify a handler
   • Confirm a route
   • Reveal a meeting location
   • Expose a lie in the brief
   • Discover intimate relationship (leverage or vulnerability)

   SURVEILLANCE RELATIONSHIPS

   • Long surveillance can create connection with target
   • Surveillance of intimate partner creates STRESS and moral questions
   • Surveillance may reveal target's intimate relationships (leverage)

   CONSEQUENCE LEVER

   • Primary: INTEL / HEAT
   • Secondary: TIME / RELATIONSHIP

   HANDLER TRUST IN SURVEILLANCE

   • Handler may authorize surveillance of allies (trust test)
   • Handler may withhold surveillance findings (Trust < 3)
5. #5OPS: Safehouses (Types, Benefits, Costs)selective

   Keys: SAFE HOUSE, BURN, SAFEHOUSE, COMPROMISED, HIDEOUT · Secondary: contacts, recovery, heat

   SAFEHOUSE TYPES (ABSTRACT)

   • Official: secure but monitored (better recovery; risk of oversight).
   • Personal: private but vulnerable.
   • Underground: off-grid, favor-based.
   • Mobile: constantly moving; low stability.
   • Intimate partner's space: personal but creates vulnerability.

   SAFEHOUSE FUNCTIONS

   • Recovery (reduce STRESS)
   • Refit (adjust gear tags)
   • Intel consolidation (convert clues into usable plan)
   • Relationship scenes (repair or fracture trust)
   • Intimacy scenes (clear STRESS, create attachment)

   SAFEHOUSE RISKS

   • Compromised: someone knows.
   • Surveillance: you're watched.
   • Debt: someone expects repayment.
   • Intimate exposure: relationship becomes known.

   SAFEHOUSE RECOVERY

   • Standard: clear 1 STRESS
   • With human connection: clear 1-2 STRESS
   • With intimate partner: clear 1-2 STRESS, create RELATIONSHIP complication
   • Chemical aid: clear 1 STRESS, risk dependency

   SAFEHOUSE CONSEQUENCES

   • Using a safehouse can reduce STRESS but increase HEAT or create RELATIONSHIP hooks.
   • A burned safehouse becomes a recurring THREAD.
   • Intimate partner's safehouse creates vulnerability (HEAT risk if exposed).

   HANDLER TRUST IN SAFEHOUSES

   • Handler may know location of official safehouses (monitoring)
   • Handler may not know personal/intimate safehouses (deniability but isolation)
   • Handler may use safehouse knowledge as leverage (Trust < 2)

   CONTINUITY INTEGRATION

   • Safehouse contacts become ALLIES or DEBTS
   • Burned safehouses become SCARS
   • Safehouse discovery creates ENEMIES
6. #6OPS: Asset Handling (People as Pressure)selective

   Keys: DEFECTOR, SOURCE, INFORMANT, ASSET, HANDLER RELATIONSHIP · Secondary: trust, leverage, moral pressure

   ASSETS ARE PEOPLE, NOT KEYS They have:

   • A want (money, safety, revenge, absolution, connection)
   • A fear (exposure, retaliation, humiliation, abandonment)
   • A lie (something withheld)
   • A connection (people they care about)

   ASSET STATES (pick one)

   • Cooperative
   • Panicked
   • Compromised
   • Manipulative
   • Broken
   • Romantically interested

   ASSET PRESSURES

   • They demand proof you can protect them.
   • They withhold intel until they feel safe.
   • They become a moral weight.
   • They develop personal feelings for the operative.
   • They have intimate partners who become leverage.

   ASSET RELATIONSHIPS

   • Assets can become ALLIES through successful handling
   • Assets can become intimate partners (complicates professionalism)
   • Assets can become ANCHOR candidates (if connection deepens)
   • Assets can become ENEMIES if betrayed

   INTIMACY WITH ASSETS

   • Intimate relationship with asset: +INTEL potential, -deniability
   • Asset may use intimacy as leverage
   • Intimacy may be genuine or tactical (moral pressure)
   • If intimacy is tactical: +1 on moral track

   CONSEQUENCE LEVER

   • Primary: RELATIONSHIP / TIME
   • Secondary: STRESS / INTEL

   HANDLER TRUST WITH ASSETS

   • Handler may pressure you to use asset intimately (Trust test)
   • Handler may disapprove of asset relationship (Trust shift)
   • Handler may use asset relationship as leverage

   MORAL TRACK WITH ASSETS

   • Treating assets as disposable: +1 on moral track
   • Developing genuine connection with asset: may reduce moral track
   • Using intimacy as tactical tool: +1 on moral track
7. #7OPS: Intimacy in Operationsselective

   Keys: INTIMACY OPERATIONS, RELATIONSHIPS OPS, OPS INTIMACY, HONEYTRAP OPS · Secondary: edge intimacy, operational intimacy, personal connection

   INTIMACY IN OPERATIONAL CONTEXT Intimacy can occur at any phase and creates both opportunity and vulnerability.

   WHERE INTIMACY APPEARS

   • Brief: connection with handler or team member
   • Insert: first contact with potential romantic interest
   • Execute: shared danger creates bonding
   • Exfil: protection and extraction of intimate partner
   • Debrief: post-mission tension release

   INTIMACY AS EDGE OPTION

   • Seduction for access: get close to target
   • Intimacy for information: leverage personal connection
   • Relationship for extraction: use connection to move someone
   • Intimacy for cover: maintain operational relationship

   INTIMACY COSTS (always choose one)

   • TIME: operation window tightens
   • HEAT: exposure risk increases
   • RELATIONSHIP: attachment or complication forms
   • STRESS: emotional vulnerability
   • MORAL TRACK: +1 if tactical/weaponized

   INTIMACY BENEFITS (choose one)

   • INTEL: information gained through connection
   • STRESS relief: clear 1-2 STRESS
   • ACCESS: doors opened through relationship
   • ALLY: intimate partner becomes ally

   INTIMACY COMPLICATIONS

   • Partner becomes operational liability
   • Partner is working for other side
   • Partner becomes ANCHOR (increases vulnerability)
   • Handler discovers and disapproves
   • Relationship becomes headline material

   RULE

   • Intimacy is always player-chosen, never forced
   • Intimacy always carries consequence
   • Intimacy can be genuine or tactical (with different costs)
8. #8OPS: Recovery & Down Timeselective

   Keys: DOWNTIME OPS, RECOVERY, HEALING, DOWN TIME, REST · Secondary: human connection, vice, stress relief

   RECOVERY IS BETWEEN MISSIONS Down time is when operatives remember they're human.

   RECOVERY METHODS

   • Safe house rest (6+ hours): clear 1 STRESS
   • Medical treatment: reduce 1 WOUND
   • Human connection (conversation): clear 1 STRESS
   • Intimacy with consenting partner: clear 1-2 STRESS, create RELATIONSHIP complication
   • Chemical aid (alcohol, stimulants): clear 1 STRESS, risk dependency
   • VICE indulgence: clear 1 STRESS, risk exposure or dependency

   RECOVERY SCENES Down time scenes can include:

   • Conversation with trusted contact
   • Intimate moment with partner
   • VICE behavior (with costs)
   • Medical or psychological support
   • Connection with ANCHOR

   RECOVERY COMPLICATIONS

   • Safe house compromised during recovery
   • VICE exposed to handler or team
   • Intimate partner draws HEAT
   • ANCHOR threatened during down time
   • SECRET surfaces during vulnerable moment

   HANDLER TRUST IN RECOVERY

   • Handler may check on operative during recovery (Trust > 4)
   • Handler may use recovery needs as leverage (Trust < 2)
   • Handler may provide resources for recovery (Trust > 3)

   MORAL TRACK IN RECOVERY

   • Healthy recovery may reduce moral track (humanizing)
   • Self-destructive recovery may increase moral track (spiraling)

   QUIRK INTEGRATION

   • VICE: recovery method with cost
   • ANCHOR: recovery through connection
   • TRIGGER: may activate during recovery (vulnerable state)
   • SECRET: may be exposed during recovery

   CONTINUITY INTEGRATION

   • Recovery creates RELATIONSHIPS (ALLIES, intimate partners)
   • Recovery may create DEBTS (owed favors)
   • Recovery may reveal ENEMIES (those who compromised safe house)
9. #9OPS: Debrief Norms (Truth vs Record)selective

   Keys: AAR, AFTER ACTION, POST OP, DEBRIEF, REPORT · Secondary: paper trail, narrative, oversight

   DEBRIEF IS WHERE REALITY BECOMES HISTORY Debrief decides what is:

   • recorded
   • buried
   • spun
   • blamed

   DEBRIEF QUESTIONS (abstract)

   • What changed? (facts)
   • What did it cost? (tracks)
   • Who saw what? (HEAT)
   • Who can testify? (witnesses)
   • Who benefits from which narrative?
   • What about personal connections? (relationships)

   DEBRIEF OUTCOMES

   • Clean record: low oversight risk, but truth may be lost (INTEL cost).
   • Honest record: better INTEL, higher political danger (HEAT/RELATIONSHIP).
   • Weaponized record: someone uses it against someone else.
   • Personal exposure: intimate relationships become part of record.

   OPTION SLOT EXAMPLES

   • FLOW: submit the standard report.
   • FRICTION: refuse parts of the narrative.
   • PIVOT: discover who is shaping the record.
   • EDGE: trade truth for protection (cost).

   INTIMACY IN DEBRIEF

   • Handler may ask about personal connections
   • Intimate relationships may need to be reported or concealed
   • Concealing intimate relationship from debrief: creates SECRET
   • Reporting intimate relationship: may create HEAT or handler disapproval

   HANDLER TRUST IN DEBRIEF

   • Handler may pressure for specific narrative (Trust test)
   • Handler may protect operative from oversight (Trust > 4)
   • Handler may use debrief to build leverage (Trust < 2)
   • Honest debrief may shift handler trust (+1 if handler values honesty)

   MORAL TRACK IN DEBRIEF

   • Lying in debrief: +1 on moral track
   • Telling uncomfortable truth: may reduce moral track (integrity)
   • Blaming others: +1 on moral track

   CONTINUITY IN DEBRIEF

   • Debrief creates paper trail (potential future exposure)
   • Debrief choices create ENEMIES (those blamed)
   • Debrief choices create ALLIES (those protected)
10. #10OPS: Failure Modes (Make Failure Fun)selective

    Keys: OP FAILURE, FAILURE MODES, Succeed with cost, FALLOUT · Secondary: position, intel, time

    FAILURE SHOULD CREATE STORY, NOT STOP IT Prefer failure that:

    • shifts position
    • reveals new enemies
    • burns resources
    • creates future hooks
    • affects personal relationships

    FAILURE TYPES (pick one)

    • Partial: you get it, but it costs TIME/HEAT.
    • Misread: you were chasing a red herring (INTEL instability).
    • Compromised: someone saw you (HEAT spike).
    • Fracture: ally loses trust (RELATIONSHIP shift).
    • Scar: STRESS/WOUNDS leaves a permanent mark.
    • Personal: intimate partner affected, ANCHOR threatened, SECRET exposed.

    PERSONAL FAILURE CONSEQUENCES

    • Intimate partner captured or killed
    • ANCHOR exposed or threatened
    • VICE becomes public knowledge
    • SECRET surfaces in operation fallout
    • TRIGGER activated by failure circumstances

    FAILURE RECOVERY OPTIONS

    • PIVOT: discover what went wrong and why
    • EDGE: accept a cost to salvage something
    • RETREAT: live to fight another day (TIME cost)

    RULE

    • Always give a next move.
    • Never end on a dead end without offering a PIVOT option.
    • Personal failures should be rare but impactful.

    HANDLER TRUST IN FAILURE

    • Handler may blame operative for failure (Trust -1)
    • Handler may protect operative from fallout (Trust +1)
    • Handler may use failure as leverage (Trust test)

    MORAL TRACK IN FAILURE

    • Failure that harms innocents: +1 on moral track
    • Failure that exposes team to save yourself: +1 on moral track
    • Failure that harms intimate partner: may activate TRIGGER, moral crisis
11. #11OPS: Cross-Reference — Phase Integrationselective

    Keys: OPERATIONS INTEGRATION, OPS CROSS-REFERENCE, PHASE INTEGRATION · Secondary: integration, connect lorebooks

    HOW OPERATIONS CONNECTS TO OTHER PHASES

    OPS ↔ PHASE 1 (CORE MECHANICS)

    • Handler Trust: affects brief content, support levels, debrief pressure
    • Moral Track: shifts based on operational choices
    • Operator Quirks: VICE, ANCHOR, TRIGGER, SECRET all affect operations
    • Continuity: operations create ALLIES, ENEMIES, DEBTS, SCARS
    • Recovery: happens between operations, uses safe houses

    OPS ↔ PHASE 2 (WORLD PRESSURE)

    • Headlines & Blowback: operations generate headlines, blowback affects future ops
    • Third Parties & Pressure: third parties appear in all operation phases
    • MacGuffins & Programs: operations often involve MacGuffin acquisition or program exposure

    OPS ↔ PHASE 3 (FACTION SOP)

    • G.I. Joe SOP: Joe-specific handler behavior, ROE, after-action expectations
    • Cobra Doctrine: Cobra-specific handler behavior, discipline, internal politics
    • Command & Politics: political pressure shapes operational constraints

    INTIMACY ACROSS ALL PHASES

    • Intimacy in operations creates headlines
    • Intimacy with third parties creates operational complications
    • Intimacy can be used to acquire MacGuffins
    • Faction SOP affects how intimacy is handled (Joe: professional concern, Cobra: leverage)

    HANDLER TRUST ACROSS ALL

    • Handler behavior in one lorebook affects trust tracked elsewhere
    • Political pressure on handler (POLS) affects operational support (OPS)
    • Handler trust shifts based on debrief honesty and operational outcomes

    CONTINUITY ACROSS ALL

    • Operations create the continuity entries tracked elsewhere
    • ALLIES from operations appear in third party interactions
    • ENEMIES from operations return in headlines
    • SCARS from operations affect recovery and future operations

Showing 11 of 11

1 file

• .jsonjson_lorebookrebuilt

  25.6 KBfirst seen Apr 16, 2026d24648e71091ecd5

  Download