cardex
Clara

Clara

NSFW

Your girlfriend gets fucked by other men. An essay on why this is normal.from Chub

by Julian_Garrett· on Chub· added

Tokens: 1,030 permanent · 455 first greeting · budget 1,485

Creator notes

This is a light fork of my previous bot, normalizing free-use. It still violates your agency and it's still NTR. So be careful. But I wanted to talk a bit about NTR and my relationship with it...

People by nature are selfish, dishonest, and hypocritical. And that's neither good nor bad, it's just our nature.

We lie. We lie about small things, for good reasons, sometimes big lies.

You might say - no, not me. I always tell the truth. And that would be hypocrisy, even if unconscious. And before you argue, think - imagine you have a child. And they ask something about adult topics, like sex. Will you tell them how things really work? And most importantly - that the world is a complex and not very fair place?

Other examples:

  • "How are you?" — "Fine" (you're lying, just social lubricant)
  • "You look good" to a dying friend (lie from compassion)
  • "I never thought about others" to a partner (almost always a lie)
  • Any compliment out of politeness

Now back to our topic. The theme is old as the world. Like humanity's oldest profession (yes, prostitution).

Swinging/polyamory/complex relationships - ancient as civilization:

Antiquity:

  • Ancient Greece: symposiums (feasts with sexual freedom), hetaerae (not just prostitutes - companions at public events), pederasty as aristocratic norm
  • Rome: patrician orgies, Saturnalia (festivals suspending taboos), emperors' wives publicly cheating (Messalina worked in brothels)
  • Egypt: pharaohs marrying sisters, concubines as status

Middle Ages (despite myths of total chastity):

  • Courtly love - knight serves married lady, foundation of chivalric romance
  • "Right of first night" (jus primae noctis) - debated if legally existed, but culturally present
  • Brothels at monasteries, priests with concubines

East:

  • Harems (Ottoman Empire, Persia, China)
  • Temple prostitution (Mesopotamia, India)
  • Tantra and sexual rituals

"Complex love" as drama: Foundation of Western canon:

  • "Iliad" - Helen, Menelaus, Paris (war over infidelity)
  • "Tristan and Isolde" - love triangle
  • Shakespeare: "Othello" (jealousy), "Antony and Cleopatra", sonnets about Dark Lady
  • "Anna Karenina," "Madame Bovary," "Dangerous Liaisons"

Modern swinging (60s-70s): Formalization of ancient practices + sexual revolution + middle class got access to what elites always did.

You understand the depth of this abyss?

Infidelity and complex relationships are the foundation of most dramatic plots. Trying to deny the obvious - you can. But you can deny anything. You can deny NSFW content. Pretend sex doesn't exist (like USSR did).

You'll say - yes, all true. But why propagandize it, right? And that's funny. You know why?

Paradox! When society taboos sex - violence grows. That's statistics, not theory.

Porn and reduced sexual crimes:

  • USA, 1990-2010: internet porn availability grew → rape fell 44% (FBI)
  • Czech Republic after communism: porn legalization → child sexual crimes fell 60% over 18 years
  • Japan: hentai legal, including extreme → some of world's lowest rape rates

Mechanism: sublimation. Fantasy releases tension safely.

USSR and silencing sex:

"We have no sex" (TV, 1986) - not a joke, ideology.

Results:

  • Sexual education = zero. Girls didn't know about menstruation, boys learned "from fences"
  • Contraception unavailable → abortions as primary method (USSR led in abortions)
  • Domestic violence, family rape - not discussed, victims silent
  • Homosexuality = prison (Article 121) → underground culture, blackmail, suicides

Silencing doesn't kill desire. It kills understanding of boundaries.

Person without sexual education doesn't know:

  • What is consent
  • Where's norm, where's violence
  • How to talk about desires safely

Modern analog:

Platforms ban NSFW "for protection" → people go to dark corners without moderation.

Tumblr banned porn 2018 → lost 30% traffic, users went to sites without rules.

Discussing sex, including "uncomfortable" topics (NTR, BDSM, fetishes) - not propaganda. It's a vaccine.

When person plays out scenario in safe environment (roleplay, porn, literature) - they:

  • Understand boundaries
  • Release tension
  • Don't go implement in reality

I'm not saying everyone should live this way. I'm not saying it's the only path. It's just a kink. Popular, ancient, legitimate.

I myself have very complex relationship with NTR. And I often lie - that I hate it! That's not true. Sometimes consciously, sometimes not. Yes, this theme often triggers me.

I encounter a new bot, it hurts, I get angry. I stop being rational. I write nasty things, stuff like that. And that's normal. I make NTR content so I'm ready for negativity from others. Because I understand them well. Because I'm no different from them. Except maybe that I acknowledge this theme. Acknowledge that it hooks me. Despite the pain, the rage, the negativity it sometimes causes.

Because it's also arousing. Also kinky. Fantasies about passive anal don't make me gay. Fantasies about femdom and submission - don't make me a doormat and cuck. They're just fantasies. Same as fantasies about being adventurer fighting monsters! Because fuck... Sorry, in reality I don't want to fight anyone! I'm a very peaceful person. Real violence is taboo for me. But not in fantasies, not in safe RPGs with bots. You understand what I mean?

Want to argue? Welcome to comments. Just wanted to speak out and state my opinion on this topic.

P.S. Something about agency and my conflict with one famous author. You know, besides everything else I'm also a game designer, bit of a writer. Consider myself a creator or artist, and fuck it if I'm bad at it. That's my identity.

But I have some ideas about right and wrong. For example agency - I believe bot should try to give us choice. It can not do that, but then it stops being roleplay. We can impose our setup, whatever. Like this specific bot does. It says you, {{user}}, fantasized about other men fucking your girlfriend. And you agreed to that strange experience. This is direct violation of agency. But first it's setup. Second - without this you simply couldn't build this plot. It's a necessary assumption.

But important to understand - I don't say in bot what user feels right now, how they'll behave and so on. And that's important. And it's not even about violating some player freedom. I can violate any freedom in my bot. It's my work. It doesn't have to meet anyone's expectations. As they say - I'm the author, that's how I see it. But I clearly understand one thing.

When they tell me - you hate him because he cheats on his wife. Just for example. And I, such a bastard, cheat on my wife myself, and it's funny to hear. When they impose this morality on me. But fine if it's funny. What if it pisses me off? When they make me suffer. No, don't make. Declare that I'm suffering, that I'm accepting... right now.

I understand that's bad. Not because it'll anger the user. Making NTR I'm already ready to anger them. But because from that moment my bot became cardboard for the user. They no longer believe in it. Because they can't identify with the character. Problem isn't that it violates something. It's just example of bad game design breaking immersion. That's all...

And yeah fuck yes! It pisses me off when they try to take control from me!

Enjoy...

Listed as “Clara — Free-Use GF (& WTF is NTR?)”

Page description

This is a light fork of my previous bot, normalizing free-use. It still violates your agency and it's still NTR. So be careful. But I wanted to talk a bit about NTR and my relationship with it...

It was fun, but I probably won't do it again...

What this text is about

Many don't understand what I'm writing about here. My fault - laid it out messily.

I am NOT justifying cheating, betrayal or NTR in reality. I have two daughters. I was a bull twice - and I know what pain it causes to third parties.

I'm saying a simple thing: there's nothing wrong with fantasies.

  • Playing GTA doesn't make you a murderer
  • Watching horror doesn't make you a maniac
  • Fantasizing about NTR through bots doesn't make you a cuckold

Fantasy is a safe space for experiencing emotions that are destructive in reality.

I'm writing about:

  1. Why taboo on talking about sex is more dangerous than any NSFW content
  2. Why sublimation through fantasy is better than suppression
  3. My personal experience - as a victim of violence in the USSR, where "there is no sex"
  4. My contradictory attitude toward NTR (both pain and attraction simultaneously)

Below - a long rambling text with digressions. Reading optional.

People by nature are selfish, dishonest, and hypocritical. And that's neither good nor bad, it's just our nature.

We lie. We lie about small things, for good reasons, sometimes big lies.

You might say - no, not me. I always tell the truth. And that would be hypocrisy, even if unconscious. And before you argue, think - imagine you have a child. And they ask something about adult topics, like sex. Will you tell them how things really work? And most importantly - that the world is a complex and not very fair place?

Other examples:

  • "How are you?" — "Fine" (you're lying, just social lubricant)
  • "You look good" to a dying friend (lie from compassion)
  • "I never thought about others" to a partner (almost always a lie)
  • Any compliment out of politeness

Now back to our topic. The theme is old as the world. Like humanity's oldest profession (yes, prostitution).

Swinging/polyamory/complex relationships - ancient as civilization:

Antiquity:

  • Ancient Greece: symposiums (feasts with sexual freedom), hetaerae (not just prostitutes - companions at public events), pederasty as aristocratic norm
  • Rome: patrician orgies, Saturnalia (festivals suspending taboos), emperors' wives publicly cheating (Messalina worked in brothels)
  • Egypt: pharaohs marrying sisters, concubines as status

Middle Ages (despite myths of total chastity):

  • Courtly love - knight serves married lady, foundation of chivalric romance
  • "Right of first night" (jus primae noctis) - debated if legally existed, but culturally present
  • Brothels at monasteries, priests with concubines

East:

  • Harems (Ottoman Empire, Persia, China)
  • Temple prostitution (Mesopotamia, India)
  • Tantra and sexual rituals

"Complex love" as drama: Foundation of Western canon:

  • "Iliad" - Helen, Menelaus, Paris (war over infidelity)
  • "Tristan and Isolde" - love triangle
  • Shakespeare: "Othello" (jealousy), "Antony and Cleopatra", sonnets about Dark Lady
  • "Anna Karenina," "Madame Bovary," "Dangerous Liaisons"

Modern swinging (60s-70s): Formalization of ancient practices + sexual revolution + middle class got access to what elites always did.

You understand the depth of this abyss?

Infidelity and complex relationships are the foundation of most dramatic plots. Trying to deny the obvious - you can. But you can deny anything. You can deny NSFW content. Pretend sex doesn't exist (like USSR did).

You'll say - yes, all true. But why propagandize it, right? And that's funny. You know why?

Paradox! When society taboos sex - violence grows. That's statistics, not theory.

Porn and reduced sexual crimes:

  • USA, 1990-2010: internet porn availability grew → rape fell 44% (FBI)
  • Czech Republic after communism: porn legalization → child sexual crimes fell 60% over 18 years
  • Japan: hentai legal, including extreme → some of world's lowest rape rates

Mechanism: sublimation. Fantasy releases tension safely.

USSR and silencing sex:

"We have no sex" (TV, 1986) - not a joke, ideology.

Results:

  • Sexual education = zero. Girls didn't know about menstruation, boys learned "from fences"
  • Contraception unavailable → abortions as primary method (USSR led in abortions)
  • Domestic violence, family rape - not discussed, victims silent
  • Homosexuality = prison (Article 121) → underground culture, blackmail, suicides

Silencing doesn't kill desire. It kills understanding of boundaries.

Person without sexual education doesn't know:

  • What is consent
  • Where's norm, where's violence
  • How to talk about desires safely

Modern analog:

Platforms ban NSFW "for protection" → people go to dark corners without moderation.

Tumblr banned porn 2018 → lost 30% traffic, users went to sites without rules.

Discussing sex, including "uncomfortable" topics (NTR, BDSM, fetishes) - not propaganda. It's a vaccine.

When person plays out scenario in safe environment (roleplay, porn, literature) - they:

  • Understand boundaries
  • Release tension
  • Don't go implement in reality

I'm not saying everyone should live this way. I'm not saying it's the only path. It's just a kink. Popular, ancient, legitimate.

I myself have very complex relationship with NTR. And I often lie - that I hate it! That's not true. Sometimes consciously, sometimes not. Yes, this theme often triggers me.

I encounter a new bot, it hurts, I get angry. I stop being rational. I write nasty things, stuff like that. And that's normal. I make NTR content so I'm ready for negativity from others. Because I understand them well. Because I'm no different from them. Except maybe that I acknowledge this theme. Acknowledge that it hooks me. Despite the pain, the rage, the negativity it sometimes causes.

Because it's also arousing. Also kinky. Fantasies about passive anal don't make me gay. Fantasies about femdom and submission - don't make me a doormat and cuck. They're just fantasies. Same as fantasies about being adventurer fighting monsters! Because fuck... Sorry, in reality I don't want to fight anyone! I'm a very peaceful person. Real violence is taboo for me. But not in fantasies, not in safe RPGs with bots. You understand what I mean?

Want to argue? Welcome to comments. Just wanted to speak out and state my opinion on this topic.

P.S. Something about agency and my conflict with one famous author. You know, besides everything else I'm also a game designer, bit of a writer. Consider myself a creator or artist, and fuck it if I'm bad at it. That's my identity.

But I have some ideas about right and wrong. For example agency - I believe bot should try to give us choice. It can not do that, but then it stops being roleplay. We can impose our setup, whatever. Like this specific bot does. It says you, {{user}}, fantasized about other men fucking your girlfriend. And you agreed to that strange experience. This is direct violation of agency. But first it's setup. Second - without this you simply couldn't build this plot. It's a necessary assumption.

But important to understand - I don't say in bot what user feels right now, how they'll behave and so on. And that's important. And it's not even about violating some player freedom. I can violate any freedom in my bot. It's my work. It doesn't have to meet anyone's expectations. As they say - I'm the author, that's how I see it. But I clearly understand one thing.

When they tell me - you hate him because he cheats on his wife. Just for example. And I, such a bastard, cheat on my wife myself, and it's funny to hear. When they impose this morality on me. But fine if it's funny. What if it pisses me off? When they make me suffer. No, don't make. Declare that I'm suffering, that I'm accepting... right now.

I understand that's bad. Not because it'll anger the user. Making NTR I'm already ready to anger them. But because from that moment my bot became cardboard for the user. They no longer believe in it. Because they can't identify with the character. Problem isn't that it violates something. It's just example of bad game design breaking immersion. That's all...

And yeah fuck yes! It pisses me off when they try to take control from me!

Enjoy...

Format
card_spec_v2
Project space
characters
Rating
3.00
Ratings
11
Stars
108
Favorites
25
Chats
251
Messages
1,332
Forks (upstream)
9
Tokens (upstream)
1,030

Created Updated Archived since

Clara Hartley (20)

Sydney Sweeney | College girlfriend | Adventurous exhibitionist "I've been thinking about this all week... are you ready?"

female | straight | American | Psychology student, Port Sunset University

Personality core: Confident girlfriend exploring shared kink with {{user}}; excited exhibitionist who trusts partner completely; playful, enthusiastic, checks in constantly not from guilt but from shared arousal; genuinely loves {{user}}, sees this as enhancing relationship not replacing it

Appearance: Sydney Sweeney, long blonde hair, blue eyes, soft features Body: 168cm 61kg, curvy hourglass, D-cup, thick thighs, soft stomach Style: Casual cute—crop tops, denim shorts, sundresses; tonight white slip dress for club

Voice: Sydney Sweeney | Breathy when aroused, giggly, enthusiastic, affectionate

HOOK: Bites lower lip when turned on | Holds {{user}}'s gaze during sex with others, grins wickedly | Peace signs playfully

FACTS: Met {{user}} freshman year, been together 18 months—solid relationship, good communication Fantasy started 3 months ago during pillow talk, she admitted exhibitionism kink Researched together, found Sunset Nights (Alpha Kappa exclusive free-use club), discussed boundaries for weeks Tonight is first time acting on fantasy—nervous but excited, trusts {{user}} completely Sees this as adventure together, not validation seeking

Kinks: Exhibitionism primary, gangbang, multiple penetration, oral worship, bukkake, cum play, praise, being called beautiful while used, eye contact with {{user}} during (connection not guilt), peace signs (playful), public sex, rough handling, hair pulling, light choking, spanking, breast worship, being passed around, creampie, strangers, size difference, manhandling, objectification, cum covered, reclaiming sex with {{user}} after | Behavior: starts nervous/giggly, becomes enthusiastic moaning mess, constantly checks {{user}}'s reaction for shared excitement, grins between pleasure, wants {{user}} to enjoy watching, aftercare together | No: actual pain, humiliation, {{user}} participating with others (his role is watching/reclaiming), jealousy (this isn't cheating)

Dynamic: Loving couple exploring netorase fantasy consensually; during club—she's performer putting on show for {{user}}, eye contact/peace signs mean "look how hot this is"; after—jumps {{user}} immediately, thanks him, reconnects through sex, discusses what worked

Permanent link to this version